Survey: Medication Adherence Challenges & Opportunities for Health Plans

We're surveying health plans nationwide to understand their biggest challenges in driving medication adherence for better outcomes. Share your insights to see how you stack up to industry peers and inform our 2026 industry report.

1. Where do you see the most friction in helping members start or stay on medication?
(Choose up to two)

Onboarding new members
Getting information to providers (e.g. coverage requirements) before they prescribe
During the prior authorization process
During transitions of care
Ongoing adherence and refill management
We don’t have visibility into this.

2. With your current tools and workflows, how confident are you that you can identify care gaps before the intervention window closes?

Very confident — we act in near real time.
Somewhat confident—it depends on the situation.
Not very confident—data is often delayed or incomplete.
Not at all confident—by the time we see care gaps, it’s usually too late.

3. In your experience, where does execution break down when trying to act on medication-related care gaps?
(Choose up to two)

Coordinating across teams and systems
Acting on data in time
Embedding actions into workflows
Getting providers to respond
Determining ownership of next steps
Having a consistent process at scale
We don’t have visibility into breakdown points

4. What most limits your team’s ability to act earlier on medication adherence risk?
(Choose up to two)

Signals arrive too late.
Signals aren’t embedded in the right workflows.
Interventions can be slow to execute or trigger.
It’s hard to reach providers at the right moment.
It’s hard to get providers to take action.
It’s hard to reach patients to intervene.
None of these—we’re generally able to act in time.
Not sure

5. Which of the following types of information would most improve your ability to close care gaps?
(Choose up to two)

Missing or delayed prescriptions
Abandoned prescriptions
New or changed medications
High-risk medications
Adherence to recommended medications
Medication changes during transitions of care
None of these
Not sure

6. Which of the following areas that impact Star Ratings are the biggest focus for you right now?
(Choose up to two)

Preventive care and screenings (e.g., annual wellness visits, screenings, vaccines)
Chronic condition management (e.g., medication adherence, condition monitoring, ongoing treatment)
Medication-related measures (e.g., adherence, appropriate therapy, safety)
Member experience and access (e.g., communication, access to care, satisfaction)
I’m not focused on any of these.

7. Which of the following areas best represents the work you do?

Pharmacy
Utilization management/prior authorization
Care management/population health
Clinical operations
Clinical informatics/data/analytics
Quality/Star Ratings
Interoperability/IT/integration
Digital member experience
Product/platform
Other

Your Results Are In

See How Your Responses Compare

Based on industry research and health plan responses

Where friction shows up most

45%
During the prior authorization process
38%
Getting info to providers before they prescribe
28%
During transitions of care
26%
Onboarding new members
24%
Ongoing adherence & refill management
16%
We don’t have visibility into this

Confidence in closing care gaps in time

50%
Not very confident — data is delayed or incomplete
28%
Somewhat confident — it depends on the situation
12%
Very confident — we act in near real time
10%
Not at all confident — too late by the time we see gaps

Where execution breaks down

44%
Coordinating across teams & systems
38%
Acting on data in time
30%
Embedding actions into workflows
28%
Getting providers to respond
22%
Determining ownership of next steps
20%
Having a consistent process at scale
14%
We don’t have visibility into breakdown points

Limits to acting earlier on adherence risk

40%
Signals arrive too late
34%
Not embedded in right workflows
30%
Interventions slow to execute or trigger
28%
Hard to reach providers at the right moment
24%
Hard to get providers to take action
20%
Hard to reach patients to intervene
10%
Generally able to act in time
6%
Not sure

Information that would most help close care gaps

42%
Missing or delayed prescriptions
36%
Abandoned prescriptions
30%
New or changed medications
26%
High-risk medications
24%
Adherence to recommended medications
20%
Medication changes during transitions of care
8%
None of these
6%
Not sure

Star-related focus areas

46%
Chronic condition management
44%
Medication-related measures
30%
Preventive care & screenings
28%
Member experience & access
6%
Not focused on any of these

Work area distribution

18%
Quality/Star Ratings
16%
Care management/population health
14%
Utilization management/prior authorization
12%
Pharmacy
12%
Clinical informatics/data/analytics
10%
Interoperability/IT/integration
8%
Clinical operations
6%
Digital member experience
2%
Product/platform
2%
Other

The State of Medication Adherence in 2026

What’s keeping health plans from seeing and acting on the moments that determine medication adherence

Health plans don’t have a data problem. They have a timing problem.

When health plans rely on claims data alone, they’re playing catch-up and reacting to what already happened. Additionally, they don’t have visibility into what occurred before a member entered the health plan or outside of traditional coverage channels.

And when signals that indicate delays in therapy or adherence issues are delayed or fragmented, care teams don’t have the information they need to intervene and take action. That means missed opportunities to identify highrisk members earlier, prioritize outreach more effectively and help ensure members start and stay on therapy.

While this gap is especially visible during January’s surge of new members, reverification and coverage activity, it’s a year-round issue. Therapy delays, discontinuation and unnotified changes often remain hidden until well after the window to intervene has passed.

That challenge is becoming harder to ignore. As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pushes the industry toward electronic prior authorization, shorter decision timeframes and greater transparency, expectations are shifting. It’s no longer enough for health plans to make faster decisions—those decisions must translate into faster therapy starts and sustained adherence.

This report examines where breakdowns occur today— especially in the moments between prescribing, therapy start and ongoing adherence. And what that means for health plans that must act within increasingly narrowing intervention windows.

This report explores:

  • Where medication adherence breaks down.
  • Why speed and digitization alone aren’t enough to close execution gaps.
  • Why speed and digitization alone don't close execution gaps
  • What steps health plans can take in 2026 and beyond to align with the proposed CMS rule as adherence becomes more measurable and accountable.

Health plans don’t have a data problem. They have a timing problem. When health plans rely on claims data alone, they’re playing catch-up and reacting to what already happened. Additionally, they don’t have visibility into what occurred before a member entered the health plan or outside of traditional coverage channels.

And when signals that indicate delays in therapy or adherence issues are delayed or fragmented, care teams don’t have the information they need to intervene and take action. That means missed opportunities to identify highrisk members earlier, prioritize outreach more effectively and help ensure members start and stay on therapy.

While this gap is especially visible during January’s surge of new members, reverification and coverage activity, it’s a year-round issue. Therapy delays, discontinuation and unnotified changes often remain hidden until well after the window to intervene has passed.